Tensions between Apple and the European Union escalated this week after the U.S. tech giant publicly demanded the repeal of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a cornerstone regulation designed to curb the dominance of major technology companies. In response, the European Commission issued a strong statement rejecting Apple’s position and reaffirming its commitment to enforcing the legislation.
Apple had previously been fined €500 million for violating provisions of the DMA. On September 24, the company released a statement demanding the repeal of the regulation and calling for “more purpose-fit legislation.” The move reflects a growing clash between global tech companies and European regulators over competition, market fairness, and consumer rights. Observers noted that this confrontation highlights the latest trend of Big Tech seeking to push back against regulatory frameworks that directly impact their business models.
Reacting sharply to Apple’s demand, European Commission spokesperson Johannes Renier told reporters on September 25 that Brussels would not bow to corporate pressure. “Since the DMA came into effect, Apple has repeatedly challenged its provisions and resisted our efforts to help it comply,” Renier said. “We have engaged in active negotiations, but Apple has chosen confrontation over cooperation. Another investigation targeting the company is ongoing, and all options remain on the table.”
The Digital Markets Act, which took effect in 2023, is part of a broader EU regulatory effort aimed at addressing the market power of so-called “gatekeeper” platforms. Under the law, companies such as Apple, Google, Meta, and Amazon must adhere to strict requirements to ensure fair competition, including prohibitions on self-preferencing, mandatory data-sharing with competitors, and increased interoperability. Supporters argue that the DMA levels the playing field for smaller firms and protects consumer rights, while critics — including Apple — claim it imposes disproportionate obligations on global innovators.
Apple’s confrontation with Brussels has become emblematic of the larger standoff between Silicon Valley and European regulators. Industry analysts say Apple’s latest demand signals a more aggressive strategy, particularly as the EU prepares to expand its enforcement actions. “Apple is not just pushing back against a single fine,” said Paris-based technology policy expert Élodie Laurent. “This is an existential challenge to the EU’s regulatory authority, and the Commission is unlikely to compromise given the political importance of the DMA.”
The Commission’s firm stance is also consistent with its broader approach to regulating Big Tech. Earlier this year, the EU fined Google for breaching competition rules related to digital advertising, and Meta has faced scrutiny over user privacy practices. By taking a hard line against Apple, Brussels is sending a clear message that no company, regardless of size or influence, is exempt from European law.
For Apple, the stakes are high. The European Union represents one of its largest markets outside the United States, and compliance with the DMA could force major changes to its App Store revenue model, which has long been criticized for its commission structure and closed ecosystem. While Apple maintains that its practices ensure consumer safety and product integrity, regulators counter that such arguments mask anti-competitive behavior.

As the dispute intensifies, observers expect prolonged legal battles, with potential consequences for both Apple’s business model and the EU’s credibility as a global regulatory power. “This is not just about Europe,” Laurent noted. “If the EU holds its ground, it could inspire other jurisdictions to adopt similar frameworks. If Apple succeeds, it would embolden Big Tech to challenge regulatory regimes worldwide.”
The European Commission confirmed that it will continue monitoring Apple’s compliance closely and did not rule out further penalties. Meanwhile, Apple has yet to indicate whether it plans to take its demands to the European Court of Justice, a move that could prolong the standoff for years.
Leave a comment